Um sum\u00e1rio executivo mesmo \u00e0 l\u00e0 Nielsen: <\/p>\n
The oldies continue to be goodies — or rather, baddies — in the list of design stupidities that irked users the most in 2005.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Resumindo um post que pode ser lido aqui<\/a>:
\n1. Legibility Problems: Fontes maradas!!!
\n2. Non-Standard Links: H\u00e1 quem esconda o facto de um determinado segmento de texto ser um hiperlink…!!!
\n3. Flash : H\u00e1 mau flash, muito mau flash e p\u00e9ssimo flash<\/a>. Ver regras de conduta<\/a>
\n4. Content That’s Not Written for the Web: curto, legivel conciso!
\n5. Bad Search
\n6. Browser Incompatibility: H\u00e1 hoje demasiados dispositivos Firefox, Mac, Linux, PDA… quer depois de todos os outros erros afastar 15% da audi\u00eancia potencial?
\n7. Cumbersome Forms
\n8. No Contact Information or Other Company Info
\n9. Frozen Layouts with Fixed Page Widths: Ver 6!!!
\n10. Inadequate Photo Enlargement – empatado com – PopUps, the most hated advertising technique<\/a><\/p>\nAo visitar http:\/\/www.useit.com\/alertbox\/designmistakes.html<\/a>, verificar ao fundo “Other top ten lists:<\/b>“. Vejam especificamente a lista de 1996 e vejam o que mudou em 10 anos, e o que n\u00e3o mudou.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Um sum\u00e1rio executivo mesmo \u00e0 l\u00e0 Nielsen: The oldies continue to be goodies — or rather, baddies — in the list of design stupidities that irked users the most in 2005. Resumindo um post que pode ser lido aqui: 1. Legibility Problems: Fontes maradas!!! 2. Non-Standard Links: H\u00e1 quem esconda o facto de um determinado […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-oldblog"],"aioseo_notices":[],"views":137,"featured_image_src":"","featured_image_src_square":false,"author_info":{"display_name":"85","author_link":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/author\/85\/"},"rbea_author_info":{"display_name":"85","author_link":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/author\/85\/"},"rbea_excerpt_info":"Um sum\u00e1rio executivo mesmo \u00e0 l\u00e0 Nielsen: The oldies continue to be goodies — or rather, baddies — in the list of design stupidities that irked users the most in 2005. Resumindo um post que pode ser lido aqui: 1. Legibility Problems: Fontes maradas!!! 2. Non-Standard Links: H\u00e1 quem esconda o facto de um determinado […]","category_list":"OldBlog<\/a>","comments_num":"0 comments","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.janjos.eu\/85\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}